G.Chandraiah, J.

1. Challenging the order, dated 14.11.2013 passed in W.P.M.P.No.39506 of 2013 in W.P.No.31789 of 2013, whereunder the learned Single Judge granted interim suspension of the appointment of the 4th respondent to the post of Deputy Registrar, made in pursuance of the Notification dated 13.02.2013, the present writ appeal is filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that since the 4th respondent is eligible, he has been selected and appointed as the Deputy Registrar; and the interim stay granted by the learned Single Judge created administrative inconvenience; and hence the writ appeal is filed.

4. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent, who is the petitioner in the writ petition, would submit that the impugned order passed in the W.P.M.P. No. 39506 of 2013 is only an interlocutory order and as such the writ appeal is not maintainable under clause 15 of the Letters Patent. In support of his contention, he placed reliance on a citation reported in Midnapore Peoples’ Co-operative Bank Ltd., & others Vs. Chunilal Nanda and others (AIR 2006 Supreme Court