SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 115

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Makineni Srinivas Rao – Appellant
Versus
Manthena Prabhakar Reddy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:Damodar Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K. Raghuveer Reddy, Advocate.

Judgment

This civil miscellaneous appeal arises out of order dated 22.04.2013 in I.A.No.43 of 2013 in O.S.No.24 of 2012 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nirmal.

I have heard Sri Damodar Rao, learned counsel for the appellants, and Sri K.Raghuveer Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent.

The respondent filed O.S.No.24 of 2012 for specific performance of agreement of sale. He has also filed I.A.No.43 of 2013 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 r/w Section 151 C.P.C. for interim injunction against the appellants not to interfere with his possession and enjoyment of the suit property. It is the pleaded case of the respondent that the land admeasuring Acs.5.17 guntas in Survey No.272/201 (old) corresponding to Survey No.173 (new) situated at Adarshnagar Village near Kamalkota, was agreed to be sold for a sale consideration of Rs.7,50,600/- @ Rs.1,44,000/-per acre by appellant No.1 in his favour, pursuant to which appellant No.1 has received a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as part sale consideration and agreed to register the sale deed on or before 14.07.2011, after receiving the balance sale consideration. That the respondent requested appellant No.1 to receive the balance sale consideration









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top