DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
B. Nandeswar Rao – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Tourism Development Corporation Limited – Respondent
Heard Sri P. Gangaiah Naidu, the learned Senior Counsel representing Sri N. Bharath Babu, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Corporation, apart from perusing the record.
Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
Shorn of extraneous particulars, the brief facts, relevant for the purpose of disposing the writ petition, are that the respondent Corporation issued notification in December, 2012 inviting applications from suitable candidates to fill up several posts, which include those of Assistant General Manager, Divisional Manager, Manager and Assistant Manager. In response to the said notification, when the petitioner applied, in view of his eligibility, experience and suitability, the respondent Corporation appointed him Assistant General Manager on contract basis for a period of 2 years. On such appointment, the petitioner is said to have been posted as Divisional Manager at Warangal.
In course of time, the respondent Corporation issued a memo, dated 29-07-2013, calling upon the petitioner to explain in respect of certain irregularities, such
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.