SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 425

R.SUBHASH REDDY, A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Radhika @ M. Lavanya – Appellant
Versus
M. Lokender – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:C.B. Ram Mohan Reddy, Advocate.

Judgment :

A. Shankar Narayana, J.

1. The instant appeal is preferred by the appellant – wife challenging the order in O.P. No.68of 2002, dated 15-05-2003, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, upholding the plea of the respondent – husband, for dissolution of marriage and granting divorce decree under Section 13 (1) (i-a) & (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, “the Act”).

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are, hereinafter, referred to as arrayed in the O.P. before the Court below.

3. The O.P. was allowed in favour of the petitioner arriving at the conclusion that he could prove adultery between the respondent and her employer viz., Ashok, by reason of which, the Court below held that her cruelty against the petitioner was also established. Aggrieved of the same, the instant appeal is preferred.

4. Since certain facts are relevant for proper appreciation of the matter, they are set out, as per the pleas, the parties have put-forth respectively. Their marriage was solemnized on 08-12-1985 at Secunderabad, and their marriage was consummated. Out of their wedlock, two daughters and a son were born. The petitioner alleged that sometime after the marr







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top