R.SUBHASH REDDY, A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Radhika @ M. Lavanya – Appellant
Versus
M. Lokender – Respondent
A. Shankar Narayana, J.
1. The instant appeal is preferred by the appellant – wife challenging the order in O.P. No.68of 2002, dated 15-05-2003, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, upholding the plea of the respondent – husband, for dissolution of marriage and granting divorce decree under Section 13 (1) (i-a) & (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, “the Act”).
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are, hereinafter, referred to as arrayed in the O.P. before the Court below.
3. The O.P. was allowed in favour of the petitioner arriving at the conclusion that he could prove adultery between the respondent and her employer viz., Ashok, by reason of which, the Court below held that her cruelty against the petitioner was also established. Aggrieved of the same, the instant appeal is preferred.
4. Since certain facts are relevant for proper appreciation of the matter, they are set out, as per the pleas, the parties have put-forth respectively. Their marriage was solemnized on 08-12-1985 at Secunderabad, and their marriage was consummated. Out of their wedlock, two daughters and a son were born. The petitioner alleged that sometime after the marr
Parveen Mehta v. Inderjeet Mehta (2002(5) SCC 706 : 2002(5) ALD SC 6)
Dr. M.G. Dastane v. Mrs. S. Dastane (AIR 1975 SC 1534)
Mirapala Venkata Ramana v. Mirapala Peddiraju (AIR 2000 AP 328).
Ch. Padmavathi v. Ch. Sai Babu (2013 (1) ALD 165 (DB).
Arun Kumar Agarwal v. Radha Arun and another (ILR 2004 KAR 808
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.