SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 356

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R. KANTHA RAO, J.
Velaga Narayana & Others
Versus
Bommakanti Srinivas & Others
Civil Revision Case No. 4709 of 2013
Decided On: 12-03-2014

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R.K. Chitta, Advocate.

Where there exists a dispute regarding suit property, Court has to necessarily issue a commission with assistance of a Surveyor.

Headnote:Civil Procedure Code, 1908---Order 26 Rule 9-Appointment of Advocate Commissioner-A genuine dispute exists between parties in relation to the identity of the subject matter of the suit-Local investigation report submitted by commissioner enables Court to make a correct assessment of evidence on record---When Court is of opinion that material on record requires elucidation, it would be just and reasonable to issue a commission for said purpose---A commission at instance of one of parties to find out as to who is in possession of property cannot be issued as it enables party seeking appointment of commissioner to collect or gather evidence---But, where there exists a dispute regarding suit property, Court has to necessarily issue a commission with assistance of a Surveyor-Appointment of commissioner for the purpose of localizing suit lands is necessary and trial Court erroneously rejected request of petitioners for appointment of commissioner-Order passed by trial Court set aside and trial Court directed to appoint a commissioner to localize suit lands with assistance of Assistant Director of Land Records.

       Result-Civil Revision Petition allowed.

       

JUDGMENT

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the order dated 22-10-2013 in I.A. No. 897 of 2013 in O.S. No. 467 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/plaintiffs and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/defendants.

The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit for bare injunction in respect of small pieces of land covered by Sy. No. 257/D of Thimmapur village against the respondents/defendants. According to them, they purchased the said lands under registered sale deeds and have been in possession and enjoyment of the said lands.

The respondents defendants contended in the suit that the plaint schedule properties have not been properly described in the schedule annexed to the plaint and that the petitioners wrongly claimed the lands which are in possession of the defendants.

Earlier, the petitioners filed I.A. No. 1822 of 2012 for appointment of commissioner for localizing the plaint schedule lands, but the same was dismissed on the ground that the petitioners suppressed the criminal cases filed in Crime No. 144 of 2011 and Crime No. 66 of 2011. However, there is no adjudication on merits as to whether appointment of commissioner is necessary or not.

Again the petitioners filed I.A. No. 897 of 2013 for appointment of commissioner to survey the land in Sy. No. 257 and 280 of Thimmapur village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District with the assistance of Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, Warangal to localize the schedule lands. The said petition was dismissed by the learned trial Court on the ground that already survey was conducted by the Inspector of Survey and Land Records, where under it was found that the lands of the petitioners are in Sy. No. 280 of Thimmapur village, but not in Sy. No. 257/D of Thimmapur village. However, the petitioners are disputing the said report.

Subsequently, as there was a dispute regarding the identity of the lands covered by Sy. Nos. 257/D and 280 of Thimmapur village, the Tahsildar, Hanamkonda addressed a letter to the Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records on 16-11-2012 to conduct resurvey by the Deputy Inspector of Survey and Land Records.

According to the petitioners, the Mandal Surveyor without conducting proper survey, wrongly reported that the plots of the plaintiffs are in Sy. No. 280 of Thimmapur village. The petitioners themselves got demarcated the lands with the assistance of Inspector of Survey and Land Records, which clearly establishes that their plots are in Sy. No. 257/D only. Thereafter the Tahsildar promulgated the orders under Section 145 of C.P.C. in respect of the land in Sy. Nos. 257 and 280 of Thimmapur village.

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners that unless survey is conducted under the supervision of a commissioner appointed by the Court, the dispute between the parties as to the identity of the subject matter cannot be resolved, therefore, appointment of commissioner for conducting survey of the land in Sy.Nos.257 and 280 with the assistance of Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records is essential.

On the other hand, the contention of the respondents/defendants is that as the petitioners filed the suit for injunction simplicitor, they have to establish their case by adducing sufficient evidence showing their possession over the property and they cannot collect some evidence by seeking appointment of a commissioner.

Here is a case, wherein, there is a dispute with regard to the identity of the subject matter of the suit. Though there is a report by the Mandal Surveyor, the said report is disputed by the petitioners and they assert that the survey has to be conducted in the presence of a commissioner appointed by the Court in the pending suit.

The Tahsildar also addressed a letter to the Assistant Director of Survey and La







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top