SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 356

R.KANTHA RAO
Velaga Narayana – Appellant
Versus
Bommakanti Srinivas – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R.K. Chitta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the order dated 22-10-2013 in I.A. No. 897 of 2013 in O.S. No. 467 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/plaintiffs and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/defendants.

The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit for bare injunction in respect of small pieces of land covered by Sy. No. 257/D of Thimmapur village against the respondents/defendants. According to them, they purchased the said lands under registered sale deeds and have been in possession and enjoyment of the said lands.

The respondents defendants contended in the suit that the plaint schedule properties have not been properly described in the schedule annexed to the plaint and that the petitioners wrongly claimed the lands which are in possession of the defendants.

Earlier, the petitioners filed I.A. No. 1822 of 2012 for appointment of commissioner for localizing the plaint schedule lands, but the same was dismissed on the ground that the petitioners suppressed the criminal cases filed in












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top