U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari @ Abdul Salem – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special P. P. for CBI – Respondent
1. This Criminal Appeal is preferred by accused No.1—Abu Salem Qayoom Ansari @ Abu Salem against the judgment dated 18-11-2013 in C.C.No.3 of 2006 passed by III Additional Special Judge for CBI cases, Hyderabad, whereunder the learned Judge convicted him for the offences under Sections 120B, 419, 120B r/w 420, 468 and 471 IPC but acquitted him of the charge under Section 12(1) of Passport Act, 1967 and sentenced:
(i) to suffer RI for a period of seven years and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default SI for three months for the charge u/s.120B;
(ii) to suffer RI for a period of one year for the charge u/s.419 IPC;
(iii) to suffer RI for a period of seven years and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default SI for three months for the charge u/s.120B r/w 420 IPC.
(iv) to suffer RI for a period of one year and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default SI for three months for the charge u/s.468 IPC;
(v) to suffer RI for a period of one year for the charge u/s.471 IPC
All the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. The facts which led to file this appeal can be stated thus:
The Inspector of CBI/SPE, Hyderabad laid charge sheet in RC.No.34(A)/2002, CBI, Hyderabad
Daya Singh Lahoria v. Union of India (2001) 4 SCC 516).
Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.) (1988) 3 SCC 609).
Monica Bedi v. State of A.P. (2011) 1 SCC 284).
Major E.G. Barsay v. State of Bombay (AIR 1961 SC 1762).
State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa (1996) 4 SCC 659).
State of H.P. v. Krishan Lal Pardhan (1987) 2 SCC 17 : AIR 1987 SC 773).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.