SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 261

S.RAVI KUMAR
Regional Director, Southern Region, Ministry of Company Affairs, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Minoo R. Shroff, Chairman, Raymond Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:G. Krishna Murthy, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S. Ravi, Advocate.

Order

1. These two revisions are against the order dated 2-5-2005 in Crl.M.P.No.995 of 2005 to 1013 of 2005 in C.C.No.14 of 2005 on the file of Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad.

2. Brief facts of the case leading to this revision are as follows:

Registrar of Companies, Andhra Pradesh filed complaint against 35 accused persons for offences under Section 58 A (9), 58 A (10) of the Companies Act and the said complaint is registered as C.C.No.14 of 2005.

3. The allegations in the complaint are as follows:

The first accused is a company incorporated under the provisions of Company Act(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for which accused 2 to 8 are directors who originally invited deposits from public through advertisements and the last advertisement was on 30-6-1997. A.9 was Managing Diredtor,A.10 was Joint Managing Director of A.1 company. A.11, A.12, A.14, A.15, A.22 and A.23 were directors of A.1 company. A.13, A.16 to A.21 are the present directors of A.1 company. A.24 is the Executive Director during the material period of time and A.25 is a company which e
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top