High Court of Andhra Pradesh
L. NARASIMHA REDDY & CHALLA KODANDA RAM, JJ.
Govt. of A.P. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture & Cooperation (AGRI-III) Dept., A.P Secretariat, Hyderabad
Versus
T. Prabhakar & Others
Writ Appeal No. 932 of 2014
Decided on : 04-08-2014
Result—Writ Appeal dismissed.
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.
This Writ Appeal is filed challenging the order dated 02.09.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.23957 of 2009. The appellant herein is the first respondent in the Writ Petition and respondents 1 to 4 are the writ petitioners.
Respondents 1 to 4 were engaged in the then A.P. Agricultural University fifth respondent herein as boy labourers, to work in the research fields of the University, between 1984 and 1988. According to them, the University was regularizing services of persons, who were engaged at the ratio of 1:1, as and when the occasion arises for making appointments against Class-IV or other vacancies. The Government issued G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance & Planning (FW.PC.III) Department, dated 22.04.1994 providing for regularization of services of the employees engaged in adhoc or temporary or daily wages not only in Government service but also in Universities and establishments appointed by the Government. The facilities under G.O.Ms.No.212 are extendable to such of the employees, who have completed five years of service by 25.11.1993.
Before G.O.Ms.No.212 came to be issued, the Board of Management of the University issued proceedings dated 04.07.1991 providing for appointment of persons engaged as farm labourers in the vacancies of the last grade service.
After G.O.Ms.No.212 was issued, the University took up the cases of respondents 1 to 4 for regularization. On finding that all of them were below age of 18 years when they were engaged and the services rendered by them after they attained 18 years is short of five years as on 25.11.1993, it addressed letter dated 25.11.2008 to the appellant for relaxation of the relevant condition. Since no action was forthcoming, a reminder was also issued. However, through letter dated 22.04.2009, the appellant did not accede to the request of the University.
Thereupon, the University addressed another letter with a request to treat the services of respondents 1 to 4 before they attain the age of 18 years as boy service.
Even that was not acceded to through communication dated 08.10.2009 addressed by the appellant. Therefore, respondents 1 to 4 filed the Writ Petition with necessary prayer. The basis for opposing the Writ Petition by the appellant herein was that the proposed action does not fit into G.O.Ms.No.212. The learned Single Judge repelled the contention and allowed the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Appeal.
Heard the learned Government Pleader for Agriculture for the appellant, learned Standing Counsel for the fifth respondent University and learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4.
The University was availing the services of different categories of employees. The farm labourers are one such category. It is mostly on daily wages, and hardly any qualifications are stipulated for that purpose. Since the research and other works are continuous in nature, same persons including respondents 1 to 4 have been engaged for quite many years. The induction of such persons into a last grade service was almost a matter of course, duly verifying their eligibility and desirability.
It is the appellant herein, which placed numerous restrictions upon the employment in the Universities and other organizations and adhocism was the order of day, for many years. When the demand for regularization of the employees so engaged mounted up, G.O.Ms.No.212 was issued for regularization of such employees. One of the conditions is that the employees must have completed five years of service as on 25.11.1993. It was also directed that it is only such of the persons, who have fulfilled the qualifications for the concerned posts, that can be regularized.
Respondents 1 to 4 did not fit into the conditions under G.O.Ms.No.212. In a strict sense, they have put in more than five years of service by the cut off date i.e. 25.11.1993. Part of their services was rendered before they attained the minimum age limit i.e., 18 years. On its part, the University felt that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.