Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.

1. In this Writ Petition, portion of the order of the Hon’ble Lokayukta has been challenged basically by way of modification before this Court contending that the Hon’ble Lokayukta has no jurisdiction to grant interim relief but can enquire into the matter finally and recommend.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Hon’ble Lokayukta and the learned counsel for the added unofficial respondents submit that it is the writ petitioner who has invited the Hon’ble Lokayukta to pass interim order. So, he is estopped from challenging the order on the ground of jurisdiction. He has drawn our attention to the complaint made by the writ petitioner himself and now, the writ petitioner having found that a portion of the order passed, is adverse against him has taken a somersault and questioned the authority of the Hon’ble Lokayukta. Learned Standing Counsel for the Hon’ble Lokayukta has also drawn our attention to the prayer of the writ petition and submits that the writ petitioner has not challenged the order passed by the Hon’ble Lokayukta.

3. While taking note of the last objection, we have examined the body of the Writ Petition and it has been specific