SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 810

High Court of Andhra Pradesh
K.C. BHANU, ANIS, JJ.
N.Deva Mandadi and 136 others - Petitioners
Vs.
State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.23932 of 2010
C.Kesava Rao - Petitioner
Vs.
State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.23931 of 2010

V.V.Naga Malleswara rao and 90 others – Petitioners
Vs.
The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.25398 of 2010
Guda Somaiah - Petitioner
Vs.
State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and five others. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.23152 of 2010
Satyanarayana Rao and 37 others - Petitioners
Vs.
The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 30110 of 2010
Decided on: 30.07.2014

Advocates Appeared:
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri P.V.Krishnaiah
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3:Addl. Advocate General for G.P. for Services-II

Important Point—
No candidate acquires indefeasible right to a post merely because he has appeared in examination or even found a place in select list.

Headnote:(A) Service Law—Appointment—Post of Excise Constables—Duty of Excise Constables requires more than average level of physical fitness and if petitioners are appointed who are in average age group of 40 to 45 at the time of filing Original Application in year 2010, it will be a handicap on the basis grass-root level enforcement machinery which results in adverse impact on crime prevention and detection and general law and order and thereby it is not conducive to Department—If any fresh selection takes place, petitioners may apply for regular recruitment and in that event, age-bar will not be put against them, but they shall satisfy other eligibility conditions and requirements including qualification—Matter is already seized by Supreme Court and petitioners now cannot agitate same issue by filing present writ petitions.

       (B) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985—Section 21—Original application—Limitation—Petitioners are having knowledge of G.O.Ms.No.1303, dated 31.08.1994, G.O.Ms.No.927, dated 21.09.1993 and Memo dated 21.12.1994 and also various orders passed by Tribunal, High Court and Supreme Court—Contention of petitioners that they came to know about Memo recently and filed Original Applications and Writ Petitions in year 2010, has to be negatived and thereby Original Applications and Writ Petitions filed in year 2010 are not within time prescribed under Section 21 of the Act.

       

ORDER

Anis, J.

1. Writ Petition Nos.23932, 23931, 25398 & 23152 of 2010 are filed challenging the order, dated 08.09.2010, in O.A.No.3143 of 2010 & batch on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’). Writ Petition No.30110 of 2010 is filed challenging the order, dated 26.10.2010, in O.A.No.6301 of 2010 on the file of the Tribunal, dismissing as directly covered by the order, dated 08.09.2010, in O.A.No.12968 of 2009 & batch (includes O.A.No.3143 of 2010).

2. All the Writ Petitions are directed to be disposed of through this common order as the facts as well as the questions are identical.

3. The brief averments made in the writ petitions are as follows:

The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise by letter dated 22.06.1993 has submitted a proposal to the Government for sanction of additional staff for strengthening the Excise Department to cope up with new task under the new Excise policy with effect from 01.10.1993 i.e. imposition of partial prohibition in the State and the Government has issued G.O.Ms.No.927, Revenue (Excise-III) Department, dated 21.09.1993 and accepted the said proposal by sanctioning 3613 additional posts of Excise Constables in addition to the existing cadre strength and further directed the Director General to release 1200 Armed Reserve Constable posts with arms and ammunition, and also directed the Inspector General (Home Guards) to release 2000 Home Guard posts to serve the Excise Department and further directed the Additional Director General (Recruitment) to recruit 3000 Armed Reserve Constables and after that they would be deputed to the Excise Department. Subsequently, the Government has modified the aforesaid G.O.Ms.No.927, dated 21.09.1993 to the effect that instead of recruiting 3000 Armed Reserve Constables to recruit 3000 APSP Constables as per the additional sanction of posts in temporary cadre of Excise Constables and G.O.Ms.No.467, Revenue (Excise-III) Department, dated 23.05.1994 also indicated regarding recruitment of number of vacancies in the IX Battalion in the State. The Government clearly discloses that recruitment should be done only in A.P. Police Battalion and those people have to be recruited temporarily in the Excise Department to cope up with the new task and for that task, they should come back to their parent department, and therefore, the posts are also created in the A.P. Police Department, which posts are required for every year. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise by Proceedings dated 14.07.1994 has informed to the Government that despite creation of aforesaid 3613 new posts of Excise Constables besides permitting to convert 539 other posts in the department, there were large number of vacancies of Excise Constables in the department remained unfilled and he had sought permission to recruit 2366 posts of Excise Constables in the Excise Department. In pursuance of such request and information given by the Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.1303, Revenue (Excise.I) Department, dated 31.08.1994, permitting the Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise to fill up 1751 posts of Excise Constables which are regular and permanent in the cadre. In pursuance of the aforesaid decision taken by the Government, the Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise has issued a notification for recruitment to the posts of Prohibition & Excise Constables in the State indicating number of posts in various districts in the State and also given schedule for selection process which would commence from 12.09.1994 and completed by 31.10.1994 i.e. issuing appointment orders. On 22.10.1994, the General Election Code came into force. Therefore, the Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise has telephonically informed all the selection authorities to the effect that the selection process should be completed for the posts of Excise Constables but not to issue any appointment orders which are supposed to be issued by 31.10.199











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top