SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 889

A.V.SESHA SAI
Raparthy Pandu – Appellant
Versus
Raparthy Vajramma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioner:M. Rama Rao, Advocate.

Judgment

This revision petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenges the order dated 22.03.2013 passed by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, Nalgonda District, dismissing I.A.No.424 of 2011 in O.S.No.133 of 2009 filed by the plaintiff/petitioner, under Order 6 Rule 17 of C.P.C.

2. The facts and circumstances, leading to the filing of the present civil revision petition, are as infra:

i) Petitioner instituted O.S.No.133 of 2009 against the respondents herein before the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, seeking the following reliefs:

a) To cancel the gift settlement deed No.4607/2006, dated 27.10.2006 and registered sale-deed No.6018/2009, dated 26.08.2009, registered in the Sub-Registrar Office, Suryapet.

b) To restrain the defendant No.3 from alienating the suit schedule land to others by way of gift, sale, mortgage or otherwise, till disposal of the suit.

c) Costs of the suit may be awarded to the plaintiff.

d) Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems just in the interest of justice to award may also be awarded to the plaintiffs.

ii) The defendants/respondents filed a written statement resisting the suit. In the said suit, the pla















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top