This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 29.04.2014, in I.A.No.1702 of 2013 in O.S.No.588 of 2012, on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

The respondent/plaintiff filed the above-mentioned suit against the petitioner/defendant for cancellation of sale deed No.7152/91, dated 21.08.1991, to the extent of plot bearing No.B5 in Survey Nos.108, 109, 113, 114 and 116, admeasuring 300 sq.yards, of Medipally Village, Uppal Mandal (presently Gatkesar Mandal), Ranga Reddy District and restrain him and his agents from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession of the plot.

The petitioner filed I.A.No.1702 of 2013 under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of the plaint. He pleaded that the plaint does not disclose cause of action and therefore, it is liable to be rejected under Clause (a) of Rule 11. He has also pleaded that as the suit is barred by law of limitation, Clause (d) of Rule 11 is also attracted. The lower Court rejected the application by the order under revision.

At the hearing, Sri Pavan Kumar Pujari, learned counsel for the petitioner, made strenuous efforts to convince this Court that the low