C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
P. Venkatrajam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
1. The petitioners who are respondents 2 to 4 in DVC No. 1/2013 on the file of VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajendranagar, Cyberabad, filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of said proceedings. For the sake of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed in DVC.
2. The complainant filed a complaint under Section 9(b) and 37(2)(e) of the Protection from Women from Domestic Violence Act (for short "the Act") seeking reliefs under Sections 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Act.
3. The averments in the report are as under: The second respondent is the father-in-law, the third respondent is the mother-in-law of the complainant and the fourth respondent is the son of the second and third respondents. The marriage between the complainant and the first respondent took place on 21-8-2008. At the time of marriage, 20 tolas gold, 2½ kgs silver and 300 sq.yards of plot were given as dowry. A week thereafter i.e., 27-8-2008 a sum of Rs. 6 lakhs was paid as additional dowry and on 28-8-2008 the first respondent left to USA. Thereafter, the complainant started living in her in-law's house where her mother-in-law i.e., the third
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.