M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Hyder Valli – Appellant
Versus
G. Venkatramana – Respondent
M. Seetharama Murti, J.
1. The unsuccessful defendants had preferred this Second Appeal assailing the decree and judgment dated 24.03.2008 of the learned II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle of Chittoor District, made in A.S. No. 15/2007 whereby the learned Additional District Judge, while partly allowing the said First Appeal had partly set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2006 of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Thamballapalle, made in OS. No. 24/2003 filed for declaration of title of the plaintiffs and other reliefs in respect of land in an extent of Ac.1.50 cents out of Ac.6.70 cents of land in Survey No. 484/1 of Boorlapalli village, which is more fully described in the schedule annexed to the plaint. At the time of the admission of the Second Appeal, this Court had taken note of the substantial questions of law mentioned in the grounds 1 and 2 and the said substantial questions of law as mentioned in the grounds of objection read as follows:
"(1) Whether both the trial Court and the 1st Appellate Court committed grave error in ignoring the admission of Respondent/Plaintiff about the title of Mushkin Saheb who got it exchanged under Ex. B1 with G. Venkatrama
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.