M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
A. K. Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , rep. , by its PP, High Court of A. P. – Respondent
1. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr PC’) by the petitioners-respondents 5 to 8 in D.V.C.No.11 of 2012, on the file of the learned VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Hayathnagar, Hyderabad, requesting to quash the proceedings against them in the said D.V. Case.
2.I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/complainant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the 1st respondent/State. I have carefully perused the material record.
2. (a) The 2nd respondent herein is the petitioner in the DV Case. The petitioners herein are the respondents 5 to 8 in the DV Case. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as petitioners and the 2nd respondent as they are arraigned in this criminal petition.
3.Now, the points for determination are -
i) Whether the petitioners have made out valid and sufficient grounds for quashing the proceedings against them in D.V. Case No.11 of 2012 on the file of learned VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Hayathnagar, Hyderabad?
ii) Whether the uncontroverted allegations made in the complai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.