SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 1332

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
HCL Technologies Limited – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Vedula Srinivas for V.V.S.N. Raju
For Respondents/Defendant: G.P.

ORDER :

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.

1. As the parties to these Writ petitions are common and the subject matter of these Writ petitions are interconnected, they are being disposed of by this common order.

The facts leading to the filing of these cases are as under:

2. Sri U. Venkat Ramana (hereinafter referred to as the 'employee') was employed as a Managing Consultant in HCL Technologies Limited HOB SCJ U-II (hereinafter referred to as the 'employer') under an offer-cum-appointment letter dt. 30.08.2010. He joined the service of the employer on 13.09.2010. He was re-designated as Senior ERP Specialist on 28.1.2011 and as Senior Management Consultant for EMC Global Project, a client of the employer, under an On-site EMC Contract for the period upto March 2013.

3. According to the employer, the employee resigned voluntarily on 11.10.2011, but according to the employee, the resignation was obtained from him under duress.

4. The employee filed an application on 07.12.2011 under Section 48(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act') before the Assist







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top