SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 1247

U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Shaik Arifa – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Pillix Law Firm
For Respondents/Defendant: Public Prosecutor

ORDER

U. Durga Prasad Rao, J.

1. The petitioner/A.4 seeks quashing of proceedings in C.C. No. 85 of 2013 on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali.

2. The police Kavali I Town Police Station on the complaint of Pattan Sonia Bhani registered Crime No. 139 of 2012 under Section 498A I.P.C. and Sections 3 & 4 of D.P. Act and investigated the matter and filed charge-sheet against A.1 to A.5. A.1 is the husband of the de facto complainant, A.2 and A.3 are the parents and A.4 is the married sister of A.1. Whereas A.5 is concerned, A.1 is allegedly having illegal contacts with her which is one of the main reasons for bickerings between the complainant and A.1.

3. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner vehemently argued that except a general and sweeping allegation against A.4, who is the married sister of A.1, that on her abetment A.1 demanded additional dowry and gold from the parents of the complainant, no specific overtacts with detailed particulars are made out in the charge-sheet. In complaint also similar type of sweeping allegations are made as if A.4 and her parents goaded A.1 to beat and torture







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top