S.RAVI KUMAR
Manjudari Neerada @ Radhi – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Narasimha Rao – Respondent
This revision is against order dated 15-7-2014 in I.A.No.191 of 2013 in O.S.No.15 of 2011 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Rajam whereunder he allowed petition filed under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act directing the revision petitioner herein for scientific examination of D.N.A. Test along with her mother Tulasi.
Brief facts leading to this revision are as follows:
Revision petitioner herein filed suit against respondent herein claiming a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards educational and marriage expenses claiming herself as daughter born to the respondent herein through her mother Tulasi. Respondent herein resisted the suit questioning the paternity of the revision petitioner and he filed I.A.No.191 of 2013 requesting the court to refer revision petitioner herein and her mother Tulasi for D.N.A. Test. Trial judge, on a consideration of contentions and rival contentions of both parties and also the law on subject, allowed the application and directed the revision petitioner herein and her mother to go for D.N.A. Test. Aggrieved by which, present revision is preferred. Heard both sides.
Now the point that would arise for my consideration in this revision is whether the ord
BHARATHA MATHA AND ANOTHER Vs. R.VIJAYA RENGANATHAN AND OTHERS
BHABANI PRASAD JENA Vs. CONVENOR SECRETARY, ORISSA STATE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN AND ANOTHER
BANARSI DASS Vs. TEEKU DUTTA (MRS) AND ANOTHER
CHILUKURI VENKATESWARLU Vs. CHILUKURI VENKATANARAYANA
GOUTAM KUNDU Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANOTHER
BHANU KUMAR JAIN Vs. ARCHANA KUMAR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.