A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Paneem Manasa – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Higher Education Department, Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat – Respondent
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the second respondent.
2. The petitioner is a student who appeared for the A.P. EAMCET examination notified on 03.03.2015. The common entrance test was conducted on 08.05.2015 and she appeared for the agriculture and medical stream. She was assigned the rank of 4995. She secured the following marks in the Eamcet examination:
| Sl.No. | Subject | Total marks | Secured marks |
| 1. | Biology | 80 | 75 |
| 2. | Physics | 40 | 17 |
| 3. | Chemistry | 40 | 20 |
|
| Total | 160 | 112 |
After adding the weightage marks of intermediate examination, she was given the above rank in EAMCET examination.
3. The present grievance relates to an answer in respect of question No.30 in B-series of Botany subject. The question paper of Botany contained 160 questions carrying one mark each.
A preliminary key was issued on 10.05.2015 followed by a final key indicating the answers. The second respondent invited objections from the students with regard to mistakes in the question papers. The petitioner raised an objection to
Pankaj Sharma v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others
Kanpur University v. Samir Gupta
C.M.R. Velu v. Convenor, EAMCET-2005, JNTU
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheith
M.B. Shashank Mathur v. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.