1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 03-7-2014 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Eluru, West Godavari district in I.A.No.715 of 2014 in O.S.No.452 of 2011.

2. The respondents filed the suit to declare the 1st respondent as the legally wedded wife and the 2nd respondent as the legitimate son of the revision petitioner and for grant of maintenance to them. In the said suit, they filed an interlocutory application to send the blood samples of the 2nd plaintiff and the defendant to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad for the purpose of conducting DNA test to decide the paternity of the 2nd plaintiff. The said I.A., was allowed by the learned trial Court. Feeling aggrieved, the defendant filed the present revision.

3. I have heard Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Yeka Balasubrahmanyam, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that without there being any prima facie evidence about the marriage between the petitioner and the 1st respondent, the trial Court allowed the petition directing the petitioner to undergo DNA test in a routin