M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Kesar Bai – Appellant
Versus
D. Kamal Kumar – Respondent
M. Seetharama Murti, J.
1. This is a civil revision petition under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 ('the Act' for brevity) by the petitioner/tenant assailing the orders dated 14.02.2011 of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad passed in R.A. No. 133 of 2008 whereby the learned Chief Judge while dismissing the said appeal of the tenant/petitioner herein had confirmed the order of eviction dated 16.05.2008 in R.C. No. 380 of 2004 passed by the learned II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad.
2. The original tenant died during the pendency of the rent control case and her legal heir is the present tenant. In this revision, the parties shall be referred to as the revision petitioner/tenant and the respondent/landlord for convenience and clarity.
3. The introductory facts, which led to the filing of this revision by the tenant, in brief, are as follows:-
"The landlord who is the owner of a double storied building consisting of three mulgies in the ground floor filed three eviction petitions against three of his tenants including the R.C. No. 380 of 2004 against the present tenant who is in occupation of the mulgi bear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.