SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 1433

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Kesar Bai – Appellant
Versus
D. Kamal Kumar – Respondent


ORDER

M. Seetharama Murti, J.

1. This is a civil revision petition under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 ('the Act' for brevity) by the petitioner/tenant assailing the orders dated 14.02.2011 of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad passed in R.A. No. 133 of 2008 whereby the learned Chief Judge while dismissing the said appeal of the tenant/petitioner herein had confirmed the order of eviction dated 16.05.2008 in R.C. No. 380 of 2004 passed by the learned II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad.

2. The original tenant died during the pendency of the rent control case and her legal heir is the present tenant. In this revision, the parties shall be referred to as the revision petitioner/tenant and the respondent/landlord for convenience and clarity.

3. The introductory facts, which led to the filing of this revision by the tenant, in brief, are as follows:-

"The landlord who is the owner of a double storied building consisting of three mulgies in the ground floor filed three eviction petitions against three of his tenants including the R.C. No. 380 of 2004 against the present tenant who is in occupation of the mulgi bear











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top