B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

1. The unsuccessful petitioners filed this revision against the order dated 28.04.2014 in I.A. No. 1866 of 2013 in O.S. No. 585 of 2007 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy. The Petitioners who are plaintiffs initially filed the suit in O.S. No. 585 of 2007 for specific performance of agreement for sale. Prior to it one S. Gopal Reddy filed a suit in O.S. No. 417 of 2007 for declaration of title against the Petitioners and both the suits were clubbed and evidence was lead in O.S. No. 417 of 2007. After evidence let in by both sides and before advancing arguments, the Petitioners filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C seeking permission to interchange the boundaries on northern and southern side stating that there was a typographical mistake in the schedule annexed in O.S. No. 585 of 2007. In the said I.A. the Respondents filed counter affidavit and contended that on the aspect of boundaries D.Ws 2 to 5 were cross-examined and if the proposed amendment is allowed, by changing the boundaries of the schedule land which is more particularly elicited in the cross-examination, there is every possibility to the Plaintiffs to fill u