SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(AP) 319

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
S. M. Fazlullah Shah Quadri – Appellant
Versus
Nemali Krishna – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.V. Ramana Murthy
For the Respondents: Venkat Reddy and Donthi Reddy

JUDGMENT

M. Seetharama Murti, J.

1. This appeal under Order XLIII Rule (1)(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code for short) by the unsuccessful defendants/appellants is directed against the order dated 20.09.2013 of the learned I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy passed in IA. No. 2297 of 2012 in OS. No. 942 of 2012 filed by the plaintiffs/respondents under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of Ac.2.38 guntas of land in survey Nos. 9 and 10 of Allapur Village more fully described in the schedule annexed to the plaint and petition.

2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellants/defendants (the defendants, for brevity) and the learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs (the plaintiffs, for brevity). I have perused the material record.

3. Now the point for consideration is Whether the plaintiffs had made out valid and sufficient grounds and had satisfied the cardinal principles for granting a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top