SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(AP) 305

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Gounda Mohammed Yousuf – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Saheb – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Gangarami Reddy
For the Respondents: S. Venkata Subba Rao

JUDGMENT

M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.

1. Aggrieved by the Judgment dated 29.10.2010 passed by the IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool in A.S. No. 124 of 2007, the present appeal is preferred by the respondents in I.P. No. 8 of 2006, wherein the 1st respondent was adjudged as an insolvent having found that he had committed an act of insolvency under Section 6(1)(b)of the Provincial Insolvency Act (for short 'the Act').

2. For convenience, the parties to the appeal will hereinafter be referred to as appellants and respondents.

3. The respondents claiming to be creditors of the 1st appellant filed petition under Section 9 of the Act to adjudge him as insolvent on the ground that he alienated his substantial part of his property to defeat and delay the claims of creditors, alleging that the 1st appellant herein borrowed an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- for construction of building agreeing to repay the same with interest, but failed to pay the same due to the 1st respondent herein. On 03.08.2002, on enquiry, the 1st respondent came to know that the 1st appellant with a view to defraud the creditors executed a sham and nominal document i.e. gift settlement deed in favour of appellants 2 and 3 o
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top