SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(AP) 418

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
E. Venkatarama Naidu – Appellant
Versus
E. Ramachandra Naidu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants: T.C. Krishnan
For the Respondents: K.V. Subrahmanya Narusu

Order

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.

1. This revision is filed challenging the order, dated 02.12.2014, in I.A. No. 164 of 2014 in I.A. No. 552 of 2012 in O.S. No. 63 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur. The petitioners herein are defendants in the suit. The respondents/plaintiffs filed the above suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with their alleged possession and enjoyment of the suit 'A' schedule property and from using the common way of 'B' schedule property for ingress and egress into 'A' schedule property and for costs.

2. Pending suit, the respondents filed I.A. No. 552 of 2012 for temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. The said I.A. was allowed on 14.6.2013 on merits and a temporary injunction was granted restraining the petitioners from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment by the respondents of the plaint schedule property pending disposal of the suit. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that challenging the said order, C.M.A.(SR). No. 345 of 2013 was filed by the petitioners before the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur and that the same is pending.

3. Alleging that in spite












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top