1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S. No. 50 of 1992 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Pithapuram (for short, 'the trial Court'), preferred this appeal challenging the decree and judgment dated 18-04-1994, whereby and whereunder the suit filed by the plaintiff for partition was dismissed.

2. The appellant was the plaintiff and the respondents were the defendants before the trial Court and, for convenience of reference, the ranks given to the parties in the suit before the trial Court will be adopted throughout this judgment.

3. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition of schedule property into 7 equal shares and to allot one such share to him with separate possession and for rendition of true and correct account of both past and future profits alleging that Ramachandra Rao, Satyanarayana, the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 2 to 5 are sons and 6th defendant is unmarried daughter of the 1st defendant. The plaintiff is the third son of the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant and his sons constituted as members of Hindu coparcenary/joint family and the 1st defendant was acting as manager of the family. The main avocation of the family members is agriculture and they hai