B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Garlapati Kamal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana Rep. by Public Prosecutor – Respondent
1. The petitioner is accused No.6 of PRC No.91 of 1994, outcome of Crime No.7 of 1992 of Godavarikhani-II Town Police Station. The committal proceedings are pending before Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sultanabad. The so-called occurrence has taken place on 13.02.1992 after 10.00 pm, there were in all six accused and the police, having investigated the crime, on the report of complainant, who is father of deceased, filed the final report. Finally in PRC No.91 of 1994, the case of accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 was separated and committed to the Court of Sessions, faced a trial in Sessions case No.755 of 1994 and by judgment dated 20.04.1995 the case against them was ended in acquittal on benefit of doubt, for the prosecution miserably failed to prove the guilt of accused beyond all reasonable doubt. Subsequently, among the others, accused Nos.3, 5 and 6 shown in abscondance again the case was split up and committed so far accused Nos.3 and 5 is concerned covered by S.C. No.285 of 2009 and they were also tried and the case was ended in acquittal against them on 07.08.2009. It is thereby, accused No.6 is alone concerned with PRC No.91 of 1994, all through in abscondance. He
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.