1. Both these writ petitions relate to the same property and while the petitioners in the former writ petition i.e., W.P.No.23030 of 2015 are owners and the petitioner in the latter writ petition i.e., W.P.No.23923 of 2015 claims to be an agreement holder from the owners and had filed a suit in O.S.No.118 of 2003 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for specific performance of the agreement of sale and the same is stated to be pending.

2. The petitioners in the former writ petition question the notice, dated 16-07-2015 issued by the 3rd respondent under Section 37(2) of the Central Act 30/13 notifying the award and further notice, dated 16-07-2015 for taking possession of the land in question.

3. In the latter writ petition, the petitioner questions the action of the respondents in acquiring the land in question on the ground that the description of the affected land was different in the preliminary notification issued by the 3rd respondent and hence, the acquisition proceedings are vitiated and unenforceable.

4. The facts in brief are as follows:-

(a) The petitioners in the former writ petition claim to be the owners of the lands admeasu