SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 2

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
T. Siddartha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Lavanya Lewis – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:T.M.K. Chaitanya, Advocate.
For the Respondents: N. Naveen Kumar, Public Prosecutor (TG).

Judgment :

The petitioner is sole accused of Crime No.210 of 2012 of Kharkana Police Station, Secunderabad registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC on the report of the first respondent defacto complainant. He sought for quashing of proceedings of the said crime pending.

The averments of the report of the defacto complainant dated 14.12.2012 in nutshell are that the accused is no other than the brother of d e f a c t o complainant-Mrs.Lavanya Lewis represented by GPA holder Pretham Powaku of Secunderabad. That she is working in a Multinational Company in Texas and in order to support her brother and from his interest to establish a company without any financial investment, she helped him by investing the entire amount which she was remitting to Bank accounts from her account and company account of MFK LLC, Chase Bank, account No.00000746517416 from USA, but, however he has been mentally harassing her for money and threatening to stop the process of US work and also harassing the ex-employees to extract money. That in February, 2011, she visited India and set up a pilot programme of operational activities of the business with a clear intention to suppor










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top