NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
J. Yadagiri Reddy – Appellant
Versus
J. Hemalatha – Respondent
This revision is preferred by the defendant Nos.1, 3 and 4 in the suit, who are the respondents as such in I.A.No.1295 of 2014. The 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff, while the remaining 3 respondents are defendant Nos.2, 5 and 6.
I.A.No.1295 of 2014 is filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC seeking amendment of the plaint. O.S.No.1383 of 2005 is instituted seeking partition and separate possession by metes and bounds in accordance with the shares of the parties and for allotment of the share of the plaintiff to the extent of Ac.5.00 gts in Sy.No.30 part, Sy.No.31 part, Sy.No.58 part and Sy.No.59 part of Dasarlapally Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The 2nd relief claimed therein was for cancellation of registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.3103 of 2003 and 3104 of 2003 dated 12.12.2003. The 3rd relief is for appointment of an Advocate-commissioner to demarcate the suit schedule properties and to allot the share of the plaintiff and the defendants as per their entitlement by metes and bounds. By moving I.A.No.1295 of 2014, the plaintiff sought for declaration that the sale deeds bearing document Nos.3103 of 2003 and 3104 of 2003 dated
Vidyabai and others v. Padmalatha and another (2009) 2 SCC 409) – Referred.
J.Samuel and others v. Gattu Mahesh and others (2012) 2 SCC 300) – Relied.
Pirgonda Hongonda Patil v. Kalgonda Shidgonda Patil and others (AIR 1957 SC 363) – Relied.
Kasula Surender Reddy and another v. M.Ravinder Reddy and others (2016 (1) ALD 437) – Relied.
Sajjan Kumar v. Ram Kishan [(2005) 13 SCC 89] – Relied.
Waheeda begum and others v. Md.Yakub and others (2014 (2) ALT 640) – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.