SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 1520

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
S. Ravinder – Appellant
Versus
Bhaskarteja – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Chavali Ramanand, Advocate
For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

1. This Criminal Appeal under Section 378 (5) of Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment dated 15.12.2005 in C.C. No. 720 of 2002 passed by the IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Warangal, acquitting the Accused for the offence punishable under Section 138of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The unsuccessful complainant of C.C. No. 720 of 2002 on the file of the IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Warangal, filed for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity "the N.I. Act") against the 1st respondent/Accused - M/s. Bhaskarteja Chits and Finance Private Limited, represented by its Managing Director E. Madhav Rao, impugning the acquittal judgment dated 15.12.2005 of the trial Court, preferred this appeal raising the contentions in the grounds of appeal that the trial went wrong with improper appreciation of the evidence on record and the acquittal judgment is contrary to law, weight of evidence and probabilities of the case, that the trial Court ought to have seen that Ex. P.1 cheque dated 6.1.2002 was admittedly issued for a legally enforceable debt and once that was di


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top