SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 102

A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Sabza Ali – Appellant
Versus
M. Raghunandan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Lasetty Ravinder, Advocate.
For the Respondent: V. Narasimha Goud, SC for HMDA.

JUDGMENT :

A. Ramalingeswara Rao, J.

1. This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-implementation of the order dated 24.11.2014 passed by this Court in WP No. 27465 of 2009.

2. Three petitioners claimed that they are the owners of the land of an extent of Ac.4-00 in Survey No. 50 and 0-20 gts. in Survey No.50/RU, situated at Pocharam village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. They stated that there was a road of 60’ wide on the southern side of their land leading from Cherlapalli village to Pocharam village. The said road is the access for their lands. The road was earmarked in the master plan of Hyderabad City as a proposed 60’ wide road. While so, when M/s. Infosys, sixth respondent constructed a compound wall by blocking the existing village road in September 2009, they filed the Writ Petition challenging the inaction of the respondents 2 to 5 in not acting on the complaint of the petitioners dated 24.09.2009 for removal of the compound wall by the sixth respondent.

3. In the writ petition, a counter was filed by the fifth respondent, HMDA stating that they visited the site and found that the sixth respondent constructed the compound wall without demarcating the proposed 60’ roa































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top