B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
P. Trivikrama Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. rep. by its Assistant Inspector of Factories – Respondent
1. The petitioner is 1st accused of the private complaint in C.C.NO.367 of 2014 on the file of IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada that is maintained by Assistant Inspector of Factories, Kakinada-I Circle, Kakinada against the petitioner as Managing Director and Occupier of Nava Bharat Ventures Limited (Sugar Division) and A2 managed the entity supra.
2. The private complaint was filed for the offences punishable under Sections 32(a) read with Section 41 and Rule 61-E of the Factories Act, with the averments that the Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories, Kakinada and Inspector of Factories, Kakinada, inspected the premises of Nava Bharat Ventures Limited (Sugar Division), Samarlakota Village and Mandalam, East Godavari District, which is a factory within the meaning of Section 2m(i) of the Factories Act, 1948, on 28.01.2012 at about 10.00 a.m., found that accused persons have failed to comply with the provisions of the Act and Rules supra viz., failed to provide D-rings to the cane trally side plate to provide support to the workers for getting down safely from the trally after completion of loading with the crane up to a height of about 6 feet in the ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.