M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Sardar Harvinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chobrolu Hutasana Rao – Respondent
M. Seetharama Murti, J.
This is a criminal revision case under sections 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('the Cr.PC' for short) by the petitioner/complainant assailing the inadequacy of sentence imposed on the 1st respondent/sole accused by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class of Special Mobile Court holding Full Additional Charge of the Court of the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Excise, Guntur in C.C.No.166 of 2006 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
2. The facts relevant, in brief, are as follows: -
The complainant/petitioner had filed a private complaint against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 read with section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, ('the Act' for brevity). The accused had contested the said case. During the course of trial, the complainant and his supporting witness were examined as PWs.1 and 2 and the accused was examined as DW1. Exhibits P1 to P6 and D1 and D2 were exhibited. On merits, the trial court had found the accused guilty of the aforementioned offence and had convicted him under Section 255 (2) of the Cr.PC. However, after hearing the accused
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.