Dr. B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

These are the two sets of six quash petitions to quash the Calendar Case proceedings, six in number covered by these petitions, leave about another quash petition in Crl. P. No. 3774 of 2015 also said to have been pending before another Bench.

2. The six quash petitions besides another one pending before another Bench in Crl. P. No. 3774 of 2015 are between lending party M/s.Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., (company) under the Companies Act, 1956, represented by its authorised signatory, N. Murali Krishna, the complainant, respectively in all cases for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'the Act') for dishonour of respective cheques, maintained against the entity (company) M/s. Nusun Genetic Research Limited, under the Companies Act, represented by its Managing Director, P. Vidyasagar as A1 and said P. Vidyasagar personally as A2 and other two directors viz., P. Chandravathi and P. Vamsi Krishna as A3 and A4, respectively.

3. The four accused supra of C.C. No. 315 of 2015 on the file of III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, maintained the quash petition in Crl. P. No. 4124 of 2