2015 Supreme(AP) 820
DILIP B.BHOSALE, S.V.BHATT
K. Satyananda Patnaik – Appellant
Versus
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, rep. by its Vice-Chairman – Respondent
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :B. Adinarayana Rao, Senior Counsel for M.V. Durga Prasad, V.S.R. Anjaneyalu, E. Ajay Reddy, S. Niranjan Reddy, N. Naveen Kumar, P. Prabhakar Rao, L. Prabhakar Reddy, Namavarapu Rajeswara Rao, K. Durga Prasad, Jhansi, Hari Sreedhar, V. Venkata Ramana, K.V. Bhanu Prasad, D.V. Chalapathi Rao, Bhaskara Rao Bandarupalli, P.R. Prasad, Kowturu Pavan Kumar, Vedula Srinivas, S. Surender Reddy, B. Vijaseen Reddy, M. Damodar Reddy, O. Manoher Reddy, T.S. Rayalu, N. Ranga Reddy, Subba Rao Korrapati, Chalapathi Rao Nandiraju, M.V.S. Suresh Kumar, P. Rajesh Babu, T. Vinod Kumar, Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, Meka Rajasekhara Reddy, V.M.M. Chary, M. Damodar Reddy, Md. Ghouse Pasha, K. Jagadishwar Reddy, C. Raghu, K.C. Venkata Reddy, Venugopal Julakanti, Srinivas Velagapudi, Kishore Rai, E. Madan Mohan Rao, K. Lakshmau, Srinivas Polavarapu, Naresh Reddy, Chinnolla, Vijay B. Paropakari, Mahfoox Nazki, G. Madhusudhan Reddy, N. Chandradhar Rao, K. Giridhar Raju, Gaddam Srinivas, P. Sreedhar Reddy, Tarun G. Reddy, M.R.K. Chakravarthy, R. Giri Kumar, P.A. Seshu, M.V. Hanumantha Rao, C. Naresh Reddy, M. Srikanth Reddy, V.V. Anil Kumar, V. Jayasree, B.S. Reddy, K. Sarva Bhouma Rao, Y. Rama Rao, Bethi Venkateswarlu, M. Rajeswari, A. Ramakrishna Reddy, M.P. Chandramouli, K.N. Vijaya Laxmi, T. Sujan Kumar, P. Mehar Srinivasa Rao, T. Srikanth Reddy, Y. Anupama Devi, M. Srinivas, Marella Radha, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Nagesh Bheemapaka, S.C. for GHMC, B.D. Maheswara Reddy and A. Bhasker Reddy, M. Dhananjay Reddy, Y. Rama Rao, SC for HUDA, D. Ramesh, SC for CRDA, N. Praveen Kumar, SC for Municipal Corporation, G. Vishweshvvar Reddy, SC for KUDA, V. Preeti Reddy, SC for VUDA, M. Surender Rao, M. Ajay Kumar, SC for TS KUDA, G. Narender Reddy, SC for ZPP-MPP-GPPS, Advocate General (TS) for G.P. for Revenue (TS) and Advocate General (AP) for G.P. for Revenue (AP), Advocate General (TS) for G.P. for Municipal Admn. & Urban Dev. (TS) and Advocate General (AP) for G.P. for Municipal Admn. & Urban Dev (AP), C.V. Bhaskar Reddy, G.P. for Panchayat Raj and Rural Dev (TS), D. Bhaskar Reddy, R.A. Chary, SC for MC KAR, NIZ, Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, S.C. for GHMC.
ORDER :
S.V. Bhatt, J.
Through this common order, we propose to dispose of writ appeals/writ petitions involving common questions of law.
2. The batch of writ appeals, is directed against the common order dated 28.04.2010 in W.P.No.26688 of 2007 and the batch. By the order dated 28.04.2010, the learned Single Judge disposed of the batch of the writ petitions by holding as follows:
"(a) It shall be competent for the Urban Development Authorities, or the Local Authorities, as the case may be, to insist on submission of clearance/permission under the 2006 Act as a condition precedent for releasing of layouts; and
(b) the land has been put to non-agricultural use before the 2006 Act came into force, such clearance/permission shall not be insisted."
3. The 2006 Act referred to is the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006, which shall be hereinafter called and referred to for short "Act 3 of 2006".
4. The prayers in the batch of writ petitions seek declaration that the petition lands which are part of a zonal development plan under the Andhra Prade
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
