R. Kantha Rao, J.

1. Heard Sri P. Chandrasekhara Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and Sri M. Praveen Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. This revision petition arose out of the order dated 6.7.2010 made in IA No. 355 of 2010 in OS No. 1633 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy at L.B. Nagar. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants before the trial Court.

2. The revision petitioner filed a suit before the trial Court for perpetual injunction against the respondents in respect of the suit scheduled property, which is an extent of 80 square yards. In the course of trial of the suit, the respondents sought to mark a document titled as 'Consent Declaration dated 3.4.1989' executed by the father of the 1st respondent in favour of the 1st respondent. The revision petitioner plaintiff raised an objection to mark the document contending that the document is a gift deed or sale deed and therefore, it cannot be received in evidence, as it was not registered. On the other hand, it was contended by the respondents that the document can be sent to the District Regi