SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(AP) 885

P.V.SANJAY KUMAR
Mohd. Shahabuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.A. Basith
For the Respondent: Government Pleader

ORDER :

P.V. Sanjay Kumar, J.

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the police authorities have not registered a FIR on his complaint dated 14.9.2015. The scope and import of the statutory obligation of the police to register a FIR upon receiving a complaint is no longer res Integra. In Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, 2014 (1) ALD (Crl.) 159 (SC) : (2014) 2 SCC 1, the Supreme Court, speaking through a Constitution Bench, summarized the law in connection with the registration of crimes as under:

1. The registration of a FIR is mandatory under Section 154 Cr.P.C., if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation.

2. If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether a cognizable offence is disclosed or not.

3. If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered. In cases where the preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the entry of such closure must be supplied to the first informant forthwith and not later tha












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top