SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 145

A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Vemunandana Ramakrishnam Raju – Appellant
Versus
Darla Srinivas – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mangena Sree Rama Rao.

ORDER :

A. Ramalingeswara Rao, J.

1. The petitioner herein is the defendant in O.S. No. 89 of 2014 on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. The respondent herein filed the said suit for recovery of an amount of Rs. 24,58,000/- from the petitioner herein. In the said suit, the Court suo motu appointed an Advocate Commissioner to mark the documents and record the evidence of plaintiff, by its order dated 16.7.2015. Challenging which, the present civil revision petition was filed. The relevant portion of the order reads as under:

"Whereas it is deemed requisite for the purpose of this suit an Advocate Commissioner be appointed to mark the documents and record the evidence of plaintiff by name Darla Srinivas, S/o. Bangaraih, Age: 40 Yrs., Business, R/o. Flat No. 7, Dwaraka Homes, Srirampuram, Bhimavaram-2, W.G. Dt., you are hereby appointed as an Advocate Commissioner. The Advocate Commissioner is directed to issue notices to both parties before examination and you are permitted to take the relevant documents from the office.

Your fee is fixed at Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only) tentatively payable be the plaintiff directly to you







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top