SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 282

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, G.SHYAM PRASAD
Maimuna Begum – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri V.H.V.R.R. Swamy
For the Respondents: GP for Home (TS)

ORDER :

C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.

These writ petitions raise common legal issues, besides separate but identical detention orders being challenged therein. Each of the detenus is detained under Section 3(1) and (2) of the Prevention of the Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (for short the 1980 Act).

2. The gravamen of the allegation on which the detenus have been detained is that they have been engaged in clandestine business of purchasing commodities meant for public distribution system by hoarding, diverting and selling the same without any licence under the A.P State Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the Control Order, 2008) r/w Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1995 (for short the 1995 Act). In the grounds of detention, it is specifically alleged that the material placed before respondent No. 2 revealed that the detenus have been doing illegal and clandestine business of purchasing PDS rice and other commodities from the ration cardholders and thereafter storing and selling the same to the needy people for pecuniary gain. The grounds referred to and relied upon three criminal cases agai


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top