SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 287

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Vooda Venkat Rao – Appellant
Versus
Vooda Surya Ramu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Prabhala Raja Sekhar
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Radha Krishna

ORDER :

C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.

This civil revision petition arises out of order dt.19.1.2016 in I.A. No. 1625 of 2015 in O.S. No. 23 of 2004, on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam.

2. Respondent No. 1 filed the above mentioned suit for partition of the suit schedule property. The petitioners are defendant Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 to 9 therein. They filed I.A. No. 1624 of 2015 in the said suit under Order XVI Rules 1(2) and 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to summon the Commissioner, Narsipatnam Municipality, to produce all the documents submitted by respondent No. 1 plaintiff in connection with his application made for permission for construction of building in Survey No. 129, bearing D. No. 36-32, Ramaraopeta, Narsipatnam, office copy of the proceedings and the sanctioned plan issued by the Commissioner, and to give evidence. The petitioners sought for summoning of all those documents on the plea that in the year 1991 partition has taken place between the parties in which the plaint A schedule property fell to the share of respondent No. 1 and that after obtaining permission for construction he has constructed the building, after filing of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top