SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 441

SANJAY KUMAR, M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Gattu Kavita – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Rajasekhar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: GP for Home (TG).

Judgment :

M. Seetharama Murti, J.

1. Gattu Srinivas @ Gattu Srinu @ Srinu son of Ramulu, was subjected to preventive detention under order dated 31.10.2015 in proceedings No.C1/9820/2015 of the Collector and District Magistrate, Nalgonda District, passed under Section 3 (1) read with 2 (a) and (b) of Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (hereinafter, Act 1 of 1986).

2. Gattu Kavita, the wife of the said detenu, filed the present writ petition seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus to produce the detenu before this Court by declaring the detention order, dated 31.10.2015, as illegal and unconstitutional. Consequential relief was sought for release of the detenu forthwith from the Central Prison, Warangal, where he is lodged.

3. The detention of the petitioners husband was approved by the Government under G.O.Rt.No.2985, General Administration (Law and Order) Department, dated 10.11.2015. Thereafter, the matter was referred to the Advisory Board under Section 11(1) of Act 1 of 1986; and, after consideration of the report submitted on 17.12.2015 by the Advisory Board, the Government c




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top