M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Virothi Tirupathi Rao – Appellant
Versus
Kota Venu – Respondent
1. These two revision petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the unsuccessful petitioner/defendant are directed against the common orders dated 19.08.2014 of the learned Principal District Judge, Srikakulam passed in IA nos. 850 and 851 of 2014 in OS no. 1 of 2010.
1.1 IA no. 851 of 2014 is filed by the petitioner/defendant under Order VIII Rule 1(3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code, for brevity) to grant leave and permit the petitioner/defendant to file the document viz., report/opinion of Sri Narindra Singh, Director, Documents Division, Truth Labs of Hyderabad, by condoning the delay in filing the said document.
1.2 IA no. 850 of 2014 is filed under Order XVI Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code requesting to issue summons to the said expert Sri Narindra Singh, to appear before the Court and give evidence on behalf of the petitioner/defendant in regard to his opinion furnished to the defendant vide File no.TLH/QD/070/2014 dated 15.04.2014.
2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/ defendant (the defendant, for brevity) and the learned counsel for the respondent/plain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.