B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

These revision petitions are sought to be filed by the accused against orders passed by the III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry, in Crl.M.P.No.1577 of 2014 (dt.26.06.2014), Crl.M.P.No.1167 of 2014 (dt.06.06.2014) and Crl.M.P.No.1074 of 2014 (dt.06.06.2014) in C.C. No.172 of 2012.

2. The revision petitioner is the sole accused and the revision 2nd respondent-proprietary concern is the complainant of the above C.C, based on Ex.P-1 cheques said to have been issued by accused in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability. In the course of trial, P.W-1 stated examined and complainants evidence stated closed and accused was examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C and it is at the stage of his entering into defence, he filed these three applications, one is to send Ex.P-1 cheque, signature in dispute, to the hand writing expert to prove that it is a forged signature and not that of the accused that can be revealed by comparison of the signature with Vakalat filed by the accused and the other two petitions are under Section 311 Cr.P.C to receive five documents enclosed said to have been deposed by complainant as witness in one