SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 511

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Sharada Bai – Appellant
Versus
Navratan Vyas – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K.V. Subrahmanya Narusu, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Murli Narayan Bung, Advocate.

ORDER :

1. The 3 revisions are arisen against the dismissal orders of the 3 applications dated 22.06.2016 viz., I.A.No.307 of 2015 in O.S.No.1815 of 2015; I.A.No.308 of 2015 in O.S.No.1816 of 2015 and I.A.No.309 of 2015 in O.S.No.1817 of 2015, passed by the learned VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. The factual matrix necessary in all the three matters common in relation to the 3 mulgies in the 3 suits filed for eviction of the respondents/tenants by the sole plaintiff saying as absolute owner and the defendants are tenants for said premises which are out of the premises bearing Nos.21-2-131/7 to 9 in the ground + 2 floors of Charkaman, Charminar Area, Hyderabad for the registered lease deeds bearing document Nos.197/2010 dated 10.02.2010, 196/2010 dated 10.02.2010 and 372/2010 dated 19.03.2010 with respective rents of Rs.7,500/- per month each with Rs.500/- enhancement every year for 21 years ending by 31.12.2030 with security deposit of Rs.2,00,000/-, Rs.2,00,000/- and Rs.1,00,000/- respectively, from the alleged default in payment of rents by giving notice terminating the respective tenancy and the contest of the defendants in respective written statements op

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top