SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 524

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
E. K. Eshwar – Appellant
Versus
K. Madhavi @ Vijayalakshmi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Maheswara Rao Kuncham, Advocate.
For the Respondents:A. Ravinder Reddy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.128 of 2006 on the file of VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for specific performance of contract for sale dated 05.03.1986 against defendants 1 to 12, of whom the defendants 11 and 12 are the minors representing by guardian the 9th defendant.

2. Pending the suit for specific performance in trial, as the suit document which is contract for sale in original sale agreement to be exhibited as Ex.B.1 in O.S.No.107 of 1994 by the defendant therein, no other than present defendants/respondents ancestor-cum-vendor of the sale agreement by name Sri S.Veerayya and that he obtained certified copy and when wanted to exhibit, the defendants herein raised objection. It is therefrom, I.A.No.520 of 2016 filed by him in the lower Court to send for the original sale agreement from that record. If it is true, said document is practically in the custody of the defendants herein as it is the say of their ancestor i.e. the 1st defendant, Veeraiah, no other than the father of defendants 1, 5 and 9, that exhibited. As per the present version of plaintiff, the document which is original sale agreement given by him to said ven










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top