M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J.

The unsuccessful plaintiff filed this revision, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, having been aggrieved of the orders, dated 21.01.2015, of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sircilla of Karimnagar District, passed in I.A No. 611 of 2014 in O.S No. 10 of 2012 filed under Section 65(c) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, requesting to permit the plaintiff to lead the secondary evidence by producing and exhibiting the copy of the registered sale deed, dated 05.08.1970, bearing document No. 1933 of 1970, to prove the material averments in the plaint in regard to plaintiffs title and possession over the suit schedule property.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri. V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/plaintiff (the plaintiff, hereinafter) and of Sri. P.V Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants (the defendants, hereinafter). I have perused the material record.

3. The case of the plaintiff, in support of the aforementioned request, in brief, is this:

The plaintiff brought the suit against the defendants 1 to 4 for declaration that the plaintiff is the owner of the plaint schedule lands and for recovery o