A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4 and learned counsel for the fifth respondent.

2. In this case, this court is called upon to examine a century old settled law by relying on some subsequent judgments decided on facts of those cases and laying down law applicable to those circumstances.

3. The first petitioner is a Religious Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and running different Charities/NGOs from the same office premises with a turn over of more than Rs. 200 Crores. The second petitioner is a Moderator of these organizations and a Bishop also. The third petitioner is the son of the second petitioner. The fifth respondent lodged a complaint on 29.09.2016 with the third respondent and the third respondent directed the registration of the complaint. Accordingly, the fourth respondent registered the complaint as Crime No. 22 of 2016. In the complaint, the fifth respondent claimed that he worked as Chief Financial Officer and in other roles in the first petitioner