SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 96

A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Pabbisetti Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. D. Jyothi Kumar.

ORDER :

1. These three writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.

W.P. No. 14072 of 2016

2. This writ petition was filed challenging the action of the respondents 3 and 5 in summoning the petitioner, illegally confining him and indulging in physical and verbal abuses, and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to cause an enquiry into the illegal confinement of the petitioner along with the physical and verbal abuse by the fifth respondent on 14.12.2015 in the office of the third respondent.

3. The petitioner stated that after his father's death, he was looking after the welfare of his family, performed the marriage of his sister and looked after the education of his brother also. The sixth respondent is his brother. The Petitioner was stated to have got married in 2007 and two children were born out of the marriage. Thereafter, he performed the marriage of the sixth respondent in the year 2014. While so, in December, 2015, the sixth respondent came to his hous






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top