SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 641

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
P. Jhon Britto – Appellant
Versus
Potluri Srinivas Chowdary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Y. Chandrasekhar for Parsa Raghavendra Rao.
For the Respondent: M. Vijay.

ORDER :

1. This appeal under Order LXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ('the Code' for short) by the unsuccessful petitioner-plaintiff is directed against the order dated 28.05.2015 of the learned Vacation Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, passed in I.A. No. 123 of 2015 in OS. No. 81 of 2015 (old numbers in vacation Court) [presently re-numbered as I.A. No. 278 of 2015 in OS. No. 505 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the learned XVI Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy at Malkajgiri] filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code for granting a temporary injunction restraining the respondents-defendants, their agents, henchmen or any other persons claiming through them from interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the agricultural land in an extent of Ac. 2.00 guntas in S. No. 635 situate at Dabeerpura village of Medchal Mandal, morefully described in the 'B' schedule annexed to the petition. I have heard the submissions of Sri Y. Chandrasekhar, learned counsel representing Sri P. Raghavender Rao, learned counsel for the appellant-plaintiff and of Sri Muddu Vijay, learned counsel for the 1st respo




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top